<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog O' Matty &#187; Solaris Cluster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/category/solaris-cluster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prefetch.net/blog</link>
	<description>Blog O' Matty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Deploying highly available zones with Solaris Cluster 3.2</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/10/deploying-highly-available-zones-with-solaris-cluster-32/</link>
		<comments>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/10/deploying-highly-available-zones-with-solaris-cluster-32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/?p=1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I discussed my first impressions of Solaris Cluster 3.2 a while back, and have been using it in various capacities ever since. One thing that I really like about Solaris Cluster is its ability to manage resources running in zones, and fail these resources over to other zones running on the same host, or a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/10/deploying-highly-available-zones-with-solaris-cluster-32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing Solaris Cluster device ID (DID) mismatches</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/03/23/fixing-solaris-cluster-device-id-mismatches/</link>
		<comments>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/03/23/fixing-solaris-cluster-device-id-mismatches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/?p=1220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to replace a disk in one of my cluster nodes, and was greeted with the following message once the disk was swapped and I checked the devices for consistency: $ cldevice check cldevice: (C894318) Device ID "snode2:/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0" does not match physical device ID for "d5". Warning: Device "snode2:/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0" might have been replaced. To [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/03/23/fixing-solaris-cluster-device-id-mismatches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of the Solaris Cluster /globaldevices file system</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/03/22/the-end-of-the-globaldevices-file-system-in-solaris-cluster/</link>
		<comments>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/03/22/the-end-of-the-globaldevices-file-system-in-solaris-cluster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/?p=1199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been working with [Sun&#124;Solaris] for as long as I can recall. One thing that always annoyed me was the need to have a 512MB file system devoted to /globaldevices. With Sun Cluster 3.2 update 2, this is no longer the case!: >>> Global Devices File System]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/03/22/the-end-of-the-globaldevices-file-system-in-solaris-cluster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running Oracle RAC inside Solaris zones</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/07/29/running-oracle-rac-inside-solaris-zones/</link>
		<comments>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/07/29/running-oracle-rac-inside-solaris-zones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/07/29/running-oracle-rac-inside-solaris-zones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While perusing my mailing lists this morning, I came across a comment from Ellard Roush on running Oracle RAC inside a Solaris zone: &#8220;There is an active project to support Oracle RAC running in a zone environment. This new feature will be a &#8220;Zone Cluster&#8221;, which is a virtual cluster where each virtual node is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/07/29/running-oracle-rac-inside-solaris-zones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deploying highly available Oracle databases with Sun Cluster 3.2</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/06/20/deploying-highly-available-oracle-databases-with-sun-cluster-32/</link>
		<comments>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/06/20/deploying-highly-available-oracle-databases-with-sun-cluster-32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/06/20/deploying-highly-available-oracle-databases-with-sun-cluster-32/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While preparing for my Sun cluster 3.2 exam, I got a chance to play with a number of the Sun Cluster 3.2 data services. One of my favorite data services was the Oracle HA data service, which allows Sun cluster to monitor and failover databases in response to system and application failures. Configuring the Oracle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/06/20/deploying-highly-available-oracle-databases-with-sun-cluster-32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running processes in fixed time intervals</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/29/running-processes-in-fixed-time-intervals/</link>
		<comments>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/29/running-processes-in-fixed-time-intervals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/29/killing-processes-that-run-to-long/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While messing around with Sun Cluster 3.2, I came across hatimerun. This nifty program can be used to run a program in a fixed amount of time, and kill the program if it runs longer that the time alloted to it. If hatimerun kills a program, it will return a status code of 99. If [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/29/running-processes-in-fixed-time-intervals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First thoughts of Sun Cluster 3.2</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/</link>
		<comments>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few weeks, I have been heads down studying for the Sun Cluster 3.2 beta exam. I finally took the certification test this week, and am hopeful that I passed (I am pretty sure I did). Prior to studying for this exam, my last experience with Sun&#8217;s clustering technology was Sun Cluster 2.2. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

