Reading through my RSS feeds, I came across the following blog post describing one Linux administrator using tune2fs to disable the “please run fsck on this file system after X days or Y mounts.”
I’ve got to admit, this is kind of annoying. I’ve taken production critical Linux boxes down for some maintenance, only to have the downtime extended +15-30 minutes because the file system was configured to run a fsck. Google searching this topic even shows other administrators trying other stupid tactics to avoid the fsck on reboot.
Is there really any value on having fsck run after some period of time? On Unix based systems (and even in Windows), fsck (or chkdisk) only runs when the kernel notices that a file system is in some sort of inconsistent state. So then I ask, why did the Linux community decide to run fsck on file systems in consistent state? ZFS has a “scrub” operation that can be ran against a dataset, but even that is comparing block level checksums. Ext2/3, RiserFS, XFS don’t perform block level checksums (btrfs does) so why the need to run fsck after some period of time? Does running fsck give folks the warm n’ fuzzies that their data is clean, or is there some deeper technical reason why this is scheduled? If you have any answers / historical data, please feel free to share. =)