<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First thoughts of Sun Cluster 3.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/</link>
	<description>Blog O' Matty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 19:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jodi</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-829378</link>
		<dc:creator>jodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-829378</guid>
		<description>Hii, anyone can help me regarding. how to configure oracle database as scalable data service ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hii, anyone can help me regarding. how to configure oracle database as scalable data service ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-790242</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Kenneth Noisewater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-790242</guid>
		<description>BTW, just took the 3.2 class, very neat stuff..  However I was wondering if anyone had any hints of a timeframe for if/when ZFS will be globalized?  Or are they thinking of making it clusterable (say a clustered zpool on shared storage that arbitrates at the zpool level, presenting zfs filesystems that are global)?

&#039;cuz that is probably the one thing that keeps VCS from getting the boot in my org: CFS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, just took the 3.2 class, very neat stuff..  However I was wondering if anyone had any hints of a timeframe for if/when ZFS will be globalized?  Or are they thinking of making it clusterable (say a clustered zpool on shared storage that arbitrates at the zpool level, presenting zfs filesystems that are global)?</p>
<p>&#8216;cuz that is probably the one thing that keeps VCS from getting the boot in my org: CFS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tirthankar</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-666614</link>
		<dc:creator>Tirthankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-666614</guid>
		<description>Solaris Cluster 3.2 U2 has been released and comes with many more useful features like providing the ability to create zone clusters and running ORACLE RAC inside a zone. 

Refer to the video blog about SC3.2U2
http://blogs.sun.com/SC/en_US/entry/sc32u2_now_available

Also Refer to SC success story at EMBARQ
http://www.sun.com/customers/software/embarq.xml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solaris Cluster 3.2 U2 has been released and comes with many more useful features like providing the ability to create zone clusters and running ORACLE RAC inside a zone. </p>
<p>Refer to the video blog about SC3.2U2<br />
<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/SC/en_US/entry/sc32u2_now_available" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/SC/en_US/entry/sc32u2_now_available</a></p>
<p>Also Refer to SC success story at EMBARQ<br />
<a href="http://www.sun.com/customers/software/embarq.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.sun.com/customers/software/embarq.xml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-508785</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-508785</guid>
		<description>Any one have bad VCS experience on Non-Sun systems? currently evaluating solutions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any one have bad VCS experience on Non-Sun systems? currently evaluating solutions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantin</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-235512</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-235512</guid>
		<description>To Joe: 
/globaldevices has to be on EVERY cluster node. and yes, its in the docs.

To Paul:
The Resource (sun cluster term) is SharedAddress.

- Konstantin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Joe:<br />
/globaldevices has to be on EVERY cluster node. and yes, its in the docs.</p>
<p>To Paul:<br />
The Resource (sun cluster term) is SharedAddress.</p>
<p>- Konstantin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-217940</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-217940</guid>
		<description>Hi Matty:

Great blog! Any idea how to get a 2-node  Sun Cluster to provide a round-robin Virtual IP address similar to what a load balancer would do? (i.e. when both nodes are running fine, load is balanced but when one is down all traffic goes to the other?)

Thanks!

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matty:</p>
<p>Great blog! Any idea how to get a 2-node  Sun Cluster to provide a round-robin Virtual IP address similar to what a load balancer would do? (i.e. when both nodes are running fine, load is balanced but when one is down all traffic goes to the other?)</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-208781</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-208781</guid>
		<description>Matty,  Like the Blog, 
Got a question, does the GlobalDevices slice have to be on each of the local nodes or can it be on Global Shared Storage like the  quorum slice in a two node config? 
I&#039;m just now starting to install cluster 3.2  for the first time and this question doesn&#039;t really get answered in the docs.

-Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matty,  Like the Blog,<br />
Got a question, does the GlobalDevices slice have to be on each of the local nodes or can it be on Global Shared Storage like the  quorum slice in a two node config?<br />
I&#8217;m just now starting to install cluster 3.2  for the first time and this question doesn&#8217;t really get answered in the docs.</p>
<p>-Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matty</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-54359</link>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 01:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-54359</guid>
		<description>Hi Dean,

A centralized syslog solution would work for the cluster engine logs, but coulnd&#039;t be used for the agent and command logs. In regards to point number 2, the sczsmf and sczsh resources can greatly assist with this. I am currently working on a project that is deploying highly available zones, and we are looking to use the Sun cluster sczsh or sczsmf components to start, stop and monitor the applications running inside these zones. 

- Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dean,</p>
<p>A centralized syslog solution would work for the cluster engine logs, but coulnd&#8217;t be used for the agent and command logs. In regards to point number 2, the sczsmf and sczsh resources can greatly assist with this. I am currently working on a project that is deploying highly available zones, and we are looking to use the Sun cluster sczsh or sczsmf components to start, stop and monitor the applications running inside these zones. </p>
<p>- Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean ross-smith</title>
		<link>http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/comment-page-1/#comment-54034</link>
		<dc:creator>dean ross-smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/28/first-thoughts-of-sun-cluster-32/#comment-54034</guid>
		<description>as far as logging goes, how &#039;bout setting up a centralized logging server through syslog.conf?  I get all  of my cluster messages on a host that&#039;s external to the cluster in one /var/adm/messages file ...

A couple of things that seem to be cool for creating failover type services...  I want to try this but haven&#039;t yet... going off of what I&#039;ve read...
1. any service that&#039;s setup through the service framework (uses xml for controlling start and stop of a daemon instead of the rc and init.d directories) can be setup as a failover service- no cluster agent necesssary. That&#039;s cool.
2. Because zones are supported as failover, that means that we should be able to set up any non-cluster aware application with init scripts for starting and killing it and fail the zone around a cluster with non-cluster aware applications inside.  That seems useful to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as far as logging goes, how &#8217;bout setting up a centralized logging server through syslog.conf?  I get all  of my cluster messages on a host that&#8217;s external to the cluster in one /var/adm/messages file &#8230;</p>
<p>A couple of things that seem to be cool for creating failover type services&#8230;  I want to try this but haven&#8217;t yet&#8230; going off of what I&#8217;ve read&#8230;<br />
1. any service that&#8217;s setup through the service framework (uses xml for controlling start and stop of a daemon instead of the rc and init.d directories) can be setup as a failover service- no cluster agent necesssary. That&#8217;s cool.<br />
2. Because zones are supported as failover, that means that we should be able to set up any non-cluster aware application with init scripts for starting and killing it and fail the zone around a cluster with non-cluster aware applications inside.  That seems useful to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

